If you can't foster relationships outside your family, you have no place trying to run a country
Printable View
Which half?
If I know that then I know where to focus...
In seriousness though, you have not supplied any evidence or examples as to where and when I do not make sense. So your observation is pretty hollow without any example... and appears like a bit of a troll post.
If you have something, then I will consider it.
Then does it matter who wins the next election? (Clearly for the Supreme Court nomination it matters.)
If a lobby group donates to both parties, then which of their supported parties do they want to have win?
Is there a reason why I should believe it matters who wins?
What does matter about one party or other winning, is who then wins...
As I pointed out way back the DNC needs to have a platform other than "resist"... specifically something meaningful and tangible. Joe seems like the favourite in the same that Podesta and Wassrman-Schultz suppressed Bernie's run in favour of HRB. It was an all or nothing gamble, and they lost.
If the DNC does not pick a good candidate and have a platform, then they will lose again.
If they win, I want them to at least have a candidate that is worthwhile for the nation.
I doubt that they can win with Joe, and I am not sure he would be worthwhile.
(call ^this^... "country before party" if you want?)
And I note that this post is seeming like yet another variation on your theme of "non-citizen"... you are consistent.
if you like facts, then please stick to facts... I am comfortable working with facts myself, and it could be a common ground for us?